From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pemberton v. Wardrop

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Nov 17, 2022
21-cv-3152-TC-TJJ (D. Kan. Nov. 17, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-3152-TC-TJJ

11-17-2022

PHILLIP PEMBERTON, Plaintiff v. MELISSA WARDROP, Defendant


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

Toby Crouse, United States District Judge

Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James issued a Report and Recommendation finding that that Plaintiff has shown cause why his case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution, and therefore recommends that the District Judge deny without prejudice Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Make Discovery, Doc. 39. The R&R allowed any party 14 days after service to file any objections. Doc. 50 at 1.

The R&R was entered on November 1, 2022, and served on Defendant by electronic service that same day and by regular mail to pro se Plaintiff. See D. Kan. Rules 5.4.9 & 5.4.10. More than 14 days have passed without parties having filed any written objection. Therefore, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2), the Court finds that in the absence of objections to the R&R, it should be adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the R&R be adopted and Defendant's motion to dismiss, Doc. 39, be denied without prejudice. The R&R (Doc. 50) is adopted as this Court's own order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pemberton v. Wardrop

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Nov 17, 2022
21-cv-3152-TC-TJJ (D. Kan. Nov. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Pemberton v. Wardrop

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP PEMBERTON, Plaintiff v. MELISSA WARDROP, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, District of Kansas

Date published: Nov 17, 2022

Citations

21-cv-3152-TC-TJJ (D. Kan. Nov. 17, 2022)