From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pelroy v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Oct 25, 2010
Civil No. 09-6128-HU (D. Or. Oct. 25, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-6128-HU.

October 25, 2010


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Hubel has issued a Findings and Recommendation [27] in this action. The Magistrate Judge recommended that a judgment should be entered reversing the Commissioner's decision and remanding this case for the payment of benefits. No objections were filed, and the case was referred to this court.

The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation of the Magistrate. Campbell v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 501 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1974).

No clear error appears on the face of the record. This court adopts the Findings and Recommendation, and this case is remanded for an award of benefits.

CONCLUSION

The Findings and Recommendation [27] is adopted and the Commissioner's decision is reversed and remanded for an award of benefits.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 25 day of October, 2010.


Summaries of

Pelroy v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Oct 25, 2010
Civil No. 09-6128-HU (D. Or. Oct. 25, 2010)
Case details for

Pelroy v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD PELROY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Oct 25, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-6128-HU (D. Or. Oct. 25, 2010)