From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pellicane v. Kelly

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 21, 2013
106 A.D.3d 558 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-05-21

In re Anthony PELLICANE, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Raymond KELLY, etc., et al., Respondents–Respondents.

Jeffrey L. Goldberg, Port Washington, for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Keith M. Snow of counsel), for respondents.



Jeffrey L. Goldberg, Port Washington, for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Keith M. Snow of counsel), for respondents.
MAZZARELLI, J.P., SWEENY, FREEDMAN, GISCHE, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia S. Kern, J.), entered March 20, 2012, denying the petition to annul respondents' determination, which denied petitioner's application for accident disability retirement benefits, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The statutory presumption of General Municipal Law § 207–k (Heart Bill) was overcome by credible medical evidence that petitioner's disabling heart condition is congenital and not related to occupational stress ( see Matter of Goodacre v. Kelly, 96 A.D.3d 625, 947 N.Y.S.2d 463 [1st Dept. 2012], lv. denied20 N.Y.3d 860, 2013 WL 599656 [2013] ). Although petitioner's physician opined that petitioner's hypertension and asymmetric left ventricular hypertrophy were induced by stress and exacerbated by the duties of petitioner's job, credible medical evidence supports the finding that the hypertension presented as relatively mild, and had not “caused its signature disease, generalized left ventricular hypertrophy” ( Matter of Knorr v. Kelly, 35 A.D.3d 326, 327, 825 N.Y.S.2d 364 [1st Dept. 2006];compare Matter of Lunt v. Kelly, 227 A.D.2d 200, 642 N.Y.S.2d 251 [1st Dept. 1996], lv. denied90 N.Y.2d 803, 661 N.Y.S.2d 179, 683 N.E.2d 1053 [1997] ).

We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Pellicane v. Kelly

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 21, 2013
106 A.D.3d 558 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Pellicane v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:In re Anthony PELLICANE, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Raymond KELLY, etc., et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 21, 2013

Citations

106 A.D.3d 558 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 3590
965 N.Y.S.2d 803

Citing Cases

D'Amico v. O'Neill

The Medical Board considered Charash's opinion on repeated remands, and adhered to its opinion, which must be…

Kim v. Sewell

Here, the Court denies the petition as the Medical Board attributed petitioner's stroke to a congenital…