From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peete v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug 28, 2012
374 S.W.3d 404 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 97557.

2012-08-28

Darnell PEETE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, David C. Mason, Judge. Timothy J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant. Timothy A. Blackwell, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, David C. Mason, Judge.
Timothy J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant. Timothy A. Blackwell, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Darnell Peete appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15 . We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).




Summaries of

Peete v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug 28, 2012
374 S.W.3d 404 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Peete v. State

Case Details

Full title:Darnell PEETE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Date published: Aug 28, 2012

Citations

374 S.W.3d 404 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)