From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peeples v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Nov 20, 2012
386 S.W.3d 211 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 97972.

2012-11-20

Gregory PEEPLES, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Timothy J. Wilson, Judge. Gregory Peeples, Jr., Bowling Green, MO, pro se, for appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Timothy J. Wilson, Judge.
Gregory Peeples, Jr., Bowling Green, MO, pro se, for appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J., and LISA K. PAGE, Sp. J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Gregory Peeples appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Peeples' request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Peeples v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Nov 20, 2012
386 S.W.3d 211 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Peeples v. State

Case Details

Full title:Gregory PEEPLES, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Date published: Nov 20, 2012

Citations

386 S.W.3d 211 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Citing Cases

Peeples v. Hurley

Resp.'s Ex. G, at 38-129. On November 20, 2012, the Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of…