From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peel v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 6, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-1052 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-1052 WBS CKD P

10-06-2015

DONALD PEEL, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, Defendant.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed August 20, 2015, plaintiff was granted 30 days within which to file a complaint for violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The thirty day period has expired, and plaintiff has not filed a complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: October 6, 2015

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
peel1052.fta


Summaries of

Peel v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 6, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-1052 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Peel v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:DONALD PEEL, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 6, 2015

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-1052 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2015)