From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pederson v. John Deere Elec. Sols.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Feb 25, 2021
Case No. 3:20-cv-51 (D.N.D. Feb. 25, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 3:20-cv-51

02-25-2021

Jason Robert Pederson, also known as Katheryn Pederson, Plaintiff, v. John Deere Electronic Solutions, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is an Order and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Alice R. Senechal on February 23, 2021, wherein Judge Senechal denied the Plaintiff's motion to withdraw her consent to proceed before a magistrate and judge and recommended the undersigned review the Order. See Doc. No. 69. The Court has carefully reviewed the Order and Recommendation, the relevant case law, and the entire record, and finds the Order and Recommendation to be persuasive. While 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(4) permits a party to withdraw its consent to a magistrate judge upon demonstrating extraordinary circumstances, the Plaintiff has failed to make such a showing here. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Order and Recommendation (Doc. No. 69) in its entirety and DENIES the Plaintiff's motion to withdraw consent (Doc. No. 68).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 25th day of February, 2021.

/s/ Peter D . Welte

Peter D. Welte, Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Pederson v. John Deere Elec. Sols.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Feb 25, 2021
Case No. 3:20-cv-51 (D.N.D. Feb. 25, 2021)
Case details for

Pederson v. John Deere Elec. Sols.

Case Details

Full title:Jason Robert Pederson, also known as Katheryn Pederson, Plaintiff, v. John…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA

Date published: Feb 25, 2021

Citations

Case No. 3:20-cv-51 (D.N.D. Feb. 25, 2021)

Citing Cases

Cartwright v. Doe

“Jurisdictions disagree about whether a motion to withdraw consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction should…