From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peck v. Wheeler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 24, 2013
3:09-CV-0381-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Jan. 24, 2013)

Opinion

3:09-CV-0381-LRH (VPC)

01-24-2013

FRANK W. PECK, Plaintiff, v. WCSO DEPUTY WHEELER, et al., Defendants.

COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT(S): NONE APPEARING


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT(S): NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:

To the extent that plaintiff's motion (#102) seeks reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge's order, it is DENIED. The U.S. Marshal does not serve subpoenas in civil cases, even if payment is made. Plaintiff's subpoena and payment instrument have been returned to him twice by the U.S. Marshal together with a list of private process servers.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By: ______________________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Peck v. Wheeler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 24, 2013
3:09-CV-0381-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Jan. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Peck v. Wheeler

Case Details

Full title:FRANK W. PECK, Plaintiff, v. WCSO DEPUTY WHEELER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 24, 2013

Citations

3:09-CV-0381-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Jan. 24, 2013)