Peavy v. Rohlfing

Full title: TIMOTHY M. PEAVY, Plaintiff, v. ROHLFING, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 22, 2013

2:12-cv-2092 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 22, 2013)

Opinion

TIMOTHY M. PEAVY, Plaintiff, v. ROHLFING, et al., Defendants. No. 2:12-cv-2092 MCE AC P United States District Court, E.D. California. May 22, 2013

          ORDER

          ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has moved for the voluntary dismissal of this action. Neither defendant Abdur-Rahman nor defendant Zamora has filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment; they are hereby dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 41(a)(1)(I). Defendant Rohlfing, who has answered, has seven days to notify the court whether he has any objection to the dismissal of this action. Should defendant Rohlfing fail to respond, the case will be dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2).

         IT IS SO ORDERED.