From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pearson v. Williams

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Mar 28, 2011
Case No. 3:10cv348/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Mar. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:10cv348/MCR/EMT.

March 28, 2011


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 16, 2011 (Doc. 20). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This action is DISMISSED for the failure to state a claim for relief and for seeking monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii).

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pearson v. Williams

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Mar 28, 2011
Case No. 3:10cv348/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Mar. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Pearson v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:SAM J. PEARSON, IV, Plaintiff, v. JOYCE H. WILLIAMS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Mar 28, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:10cv348/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Mar. 28, 2011)