Opinion
No. ED 103236
04-12-2016
Michael Pearson, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Randall G. Brachman, Missouri Public Defender Office, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Colette E. Neuner, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.
Randall G. Brachman, Missouri Public Defender Office, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Colette E. Neuner, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michael Pearson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).