From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pearson v. Fontaine

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Aug 9, 1991
583 So. 2d 493 (La. 1991)

Summary

In Pearson v. Fontaine, 583 So.2d 493 (La. 1991), the supreme court recognized a trial court's authority to limit the time within which a litigant can file the documentation required to proceed as a pauper.

Summary of this case from Harrison v. Minardi

Opinion

No. 91-OC-1847.

August 9, 1991.

In re Person, Mike; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Jefferson, First Parish Court, Div. "A", No. 00900166; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 91-CW-0185.


Granted. Case remanded to the Parish court to permit relator to comply with art. 5183 of the Code of Civil Procedure within 15 days. The date that costs are due (August 19, 1991) is stayed until the trial judge has acted. If relator does not file an application to proceed in form a pauperis within the 15-day period, the stay order is dissolved.


Summaries of

Pearson v. Fontaine

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Aug 9, 1991
583 So. 2d 493 (La. 1991)

In Pearson v. Fontaine, 583 So.2d 493 (La. 1991), the supreme court recognized a trial court's authority to limit the time within which a litigant can file the documentation required to proceed as a pauper.

Summary of this case from Harrison v. Minardi
Case details for

Pearson v. Fontaine

Case Details

Full title:MIKE PEARSON v. FRANK FONTAINE

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Aug 9, 1991

Citations

583 So. 2d 493 (La. 1991)

Citing Cases

Harrison v. Minardi

This argument ignores the trial court's authority to establish a deadline to post a bond and is without…