From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pearce v. Horton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
May 22, 2017
Civil No. 17-48 (DWF/LIB) (D. Minn. May. 22, 2017)

Opinion

Civil No. 17-48 (DWF/LIB)

05-22-2017

Latina Pearce, Plaintiff, v. Raymond Horton, Janine Lepage, Charles Halverson, and Eli Loven, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated May 2, 2017. (Doc. No. 10.) No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following:

ORDER

1. Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois's May 2, 2017 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. [10]) is ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiff's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (Doc. No. [2]) is DENIED.

3. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: May 22, 2017

s/Donovan W. Frank

DONOVAN W. FRANK

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Pearce v. Horton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
May 22, 2017
Civil No. 17-48 (DWF/LIB) (D. Minn. May. 22, 2017)
Case details for

Pearce v. Horton

Case Details

Full title:Latina Pearce, Plaintiff, v. Raymond Horton, Janine Lepage, Charles…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: May 22, 2017

Citations

Civil No. 17-48 (DWF/LIB) (D. Minn. May. 22, 2017)