From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peabody v. Perry Twp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 12, 2013
Case No. 2:10-cv-1078 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-cv-1078

04-12-2013

LAURIE PEABODY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PERRY TOWNSHIP, OHIO, et al., Defendants.


JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendants' motions to strike. (Docs. No. 84, 85.) In those motions, Defendants ask the Court to strike a notice of supplemental authority (Doc. No. 83) that Plaintiffs filed to support their memoranda in opposition to Defendants' motions for summary judgment or to, alternatively, permit them to respond to the notice. Defendants contend that Plaintiffs failed to properly request permission to provide supplemental authority. This Court, however, did not consider Plaintiffs' supplemental briefing in its decision issued on Defendants' motions for summary judgment. Therefore, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Defendants' motion to strike. The Clerk is DIRECTED to remove those motions from this Court's pending motions list.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________________

EDMUND A. SARGUS , JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Peabody v. Perry Twp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 12, 2013
Case No. 2:10-cv-1078 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Peabody v. Perry Twp.

Case Details

Full title:LAURIE PEABODY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PERRY TOWNSHIP, OHIO, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 12, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:10-cv-1078 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 12, 2013)