Payton v. Nantucket Partners, L.P.

Full title: GAYL PAYTON v. NANTUCKET PARTNERS, L.P., and RICHMARK PROPERTIES, INC.

Court: United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 22, 2011

Case No. 4:10-cv-00143 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 22, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 4:10-cv-00143

09-22-2011

GAYL PAYTON v. NANTUCKET PARTNERS, L.P., and RICHMARK PROPERTIES, INC.

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

(Judge Schneider/Judge Mazzant)

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On August 19, 2011, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #43) should be granted.

The Court, having made a de novo review of Plaintiff's construed objections (Dkt. #57), is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections are without merit. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #43) is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

It is SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE