From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Payton v. Cavalry Portfolio Servs.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 29, 2024
No. 24-CV-00182-HSG (N.D. Cal. May. 29, 2024)

Opinion

24-CV-00182-HSG

05-29-2024

JIM PAYTON, Plaintiff, v. CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court ORDERS Plaintiff's counsel, Ely Grinvald, to SHOW CAUSE as to why he should not be monetarily sanctioned in the amount of reasonable attorney fees expended by Defense counsel addressing Mr. Grinvald's failure to file an opposition or statement of nonopposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss by the May 21, 2024 deadline, and for instead filing a motion for an extension of time on May 22, 2024 with no factual support or justification for the request, Dkt. No. 30. Mr. Grinvald must file a response no later than June 4, 2024.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Payton v. Cavalry Portfolio Servs.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 29, 2024
No. 24-CV-00182-HSG (N.D. Cal. May. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Payton v. Cavalry Portfolio Servs.

Case Details

Full title:JIM PAYTON, Plaintiff, v. CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 29, 2024

Citations

No. 24-CV-00182-HSG (N.D. Cal. May. 29, 2024)