From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Payne v. Variety Stores, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 11, 2013
No. 5:12-CV-133-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 11, 2013)

Opinion

No. 5:12-CV-133-D

01-11-2013

NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR ACCESSIBILITY, INC., and DENISE PAYNE, Plaintiffs, v. VARIETY STORES, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

On May 2, 2012, National Alliance for Accessibility, Inc. ("National Alliance"), and Denise Payne ("Payne") (collectively, "plaintiffs") filed suit under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189, against Variety Stores, Inc. ("Variety Stores") [D.E. 4]. On September 10, 2012, Variety Stores moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of standing [D.E. 13]. On October 1, 2012, plaintiffs responded in opposition [D.E. 16-17].

The court is very familiar with Article III's standing requirements and the governing standard. The relevant facts of this case are essentially indistinguishable from other recent cases involving Payne that were dismissed for lack of standing. See, e.g.. Nat'l Alliance for Accessibility, Inc. v. Big Lots Stores. Inc., No. 5:11-CV-741-FL, 2012 WL 3835870, at * 3-4 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 4, 2012) (unpublished); Payne v. Sears. Roebuck & Co., No. 5:11-CV-614-D, 2012 WL 1965389, at * 2-8 (E.D.N.C. May 31, 2012) (unpublished). Following the reasoning in those cases, the court concludes that Payne lacks standing to pursue claims against Variety Stores.

Because Payne lacks standing, National Alliance lacks associational standing. See, e.g., Sears, 2012 WL 1965389, at *9. Furthermore, because National Alliance's suit against Variety Stores to enforce ADA compliance appears to be the consummation of the organization's purpose, National Alliance has not alleged an injury to the organization itself and therefore lacks organizational standing. See, e.g., Goldstein v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 278 F. Supp. 2d 766, 769-72 (E.D. Va. 2003); Clark v. Burger King Corp., 255 F. Supp. 2d 334, 344-45 (D.N.J. 2003).

In sum, plaintiffs have not alleged facts that establish Article III standing. Accordingly, the court does not have subject-matter jurisdiction over plaintiffs' claims and GRANTS Variety Stores's motion to dismiss [D.E. 13].

____________

JAMES C. DEVER III

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Payne v. Variety Stores, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 11, 2013
No. 5:12-CV-133-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Payne v. Variety Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Denise Payne, and National Alliance for Accessibility, Inc., Plaintiffs…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 11, 2013

Citations

No. 5:12-CV-133-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 11, 2013)

Citing Cases

Nat'l Alliance for Accessibility, Inc. v. Belk, Inc.

Thus, the alleged injury is not attributable to defendant and cannot serve as a basis for organizational…