Payne v. McDaniel

Full title: MICHAEL PAYNE, Petitioner, v. E.K. McDANIEL, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Oct 19, 2011

CV 10-9912 CJC (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)

Opinion

MICHAEL PAYNE, Petitioner, v. E.K. McDANIEL, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 10-9912 CJC (MRW) United States District Court, C.D. California. October 19, 2011

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.