From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Payne v. Dirton-Hill

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 3, 2009
314 F. App'x 607 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-2389.

Submitted: February 26, 2009.

Decided: March 3, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (6:08-cv-01924-GRA).

Marcus S. Payne, Appellant Pro Se. Dorothy Dirton-Hill; Broadus F. Jones; Daisy E. Jones; Adalynn C. Payne, Appellees Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Marcus S. Payne appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Payne's motions to supplement the record and for equal consideration and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Payne v. Dirton-Hill, No. 6:08-cv-01924-GRA, 2008 WL 5114462 (D.S.C. Dec. 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Payne v. Dirton-Hill

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 3, 2009
314 F. App'x 607 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Payne v. Dirton-Hill

Case Details

Full title:Marcus S. PAYNE, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Eric C. Payne, Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Mar 3, 2009

Citations

314 F. App'x 607 (4th Cir. 2009)