From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pautsky v. Ohmstede

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jul 10, 2014
NO. 02-14-00086-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 10, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 02-14-00086-CV

07-10-2014

ROBERT PAUTSKY APPELLANT v. GREGORY OHMSTEDE APPELLEE


FROM THE 78TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 176,057-B


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellant's "Motion to Dismiss Appeal." It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Pautsky v. Ohmstede

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jul 10, 2014
NO. 02-14-00086-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 10, 2014)
Case details for

Pautsky v. Ohmstede

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT PAUTSKY APPELLANT v. GREGORY OHMSTEDE APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Jul 10, 2014

Citations

NO. 02-14-00086-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 10, 2014)