From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paushok v. Ganbold

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 18, 2021
20 CIVIL 4769 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2021)

Opinion

20 CIVIL 4769 (JPC)

03-18-2021

SERGEY VIKTOROVICH PAUSHOK, Plaintiff, v. TORDAI GANBOLD et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated March 18, 2021, Defendants' motions to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) are granted as to Paushok's FDCPA claim. Because the Court finds that any amendment would be futile, the FDCPA claim is dismissed with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Paushok's remaining N.Y. G.B.L. § 349 claim, which is dismissed without prejudice; accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

March 18, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Paushok v. Ganbold

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 18, 2021
20 CIVIL 4769 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Paushok v. Ganbold

Case Details

Full title:SERGEY VIKTOROVICH PAUSHOK, Plaintiff, v. TORDAI GANBOLD et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 18, 2021

Citations

20 CIVIL 4769 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2021)