From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paul Londe, Inc. v. Enger

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Feb 16, 1993
846 S.W.2d 260 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 55709.

February 16, 1993.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY; KENNETH M. WEINSTOCK, JUDGE.

Burton M. Greenberg, Greenberg, Pleban, Fleming Simons, St. Louis, for appellant.

Edwin D. Akers, Jr., Thomas J. Campbell, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.


ORDER


Plaintiff sued defendants on a promissory note. The jury found in favor of plaintiff, and the trial court entered judgment accordingly.

Five of the defendants appealed. Thereafter, defendants Leslie Borowsky and Melvin Goldstein voluntarily dismissed their appeals. The appeal of Barry Worth was dismissed as moot following his discharge in bankruptcy. Thus, only the appeals of Sheldon Enger and P. Granville Mitchell remain.

The evidence in support of the jury's verdict is sufficient to support the verdict, and no error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Paul Londe, Inc. v. Enger

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Feb 16, 1993
846 S.W.2d 260 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Paul Londe, Inc. v. Enger

Case Details

Full title:PAUL LONDE, INC., PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, v. SHELDON ENGER, LESLIE BOROWSKY…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Feb 16, 1993

Citations

846 S.W.2d 260 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)