From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patton v. Loadholt

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 25, 2023
2:19-cv-0451 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 25, 2023)

Opinion

2:19-cv-0451 KJN P

07-25-2023

ANTHONY L. PATTON, Plaintiff, v. F.N.P. LOADHOLT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to file a reply to defendants' opposition to plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment. Plaintiff requests until August 1, 2023, to file the reply. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (ECF No. 168) is granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted until August 1, 2023, in which to file a reply to defendants' opposition (ECF No. 165).


Summaries of

Patton v. Loadholt

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 25, 2023
2:19-cv-0451 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Patton v. Loadholt

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY L. PATTON, Plaintiff, v. F.N.P. LOADHOLT, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 25, 2023

Citations

2:19-cv-0451 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 25, 2023)