From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Sep 25, 2001
55 S.W.3d 888 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 79128

September 25, 2001

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County Honorable John W. Grimm.

Mark A. Grothoff, 3402 Buttonwood, Columbia, MO 65201, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stacy L. Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Richard B. Teitelman, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, J., and Clifford H. Ahrens, J.



ORDER

Appellant, Maurice Patterson, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

All Rule references are to the Missouri Court Rules (2001).


Summaries of

Patterson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Sep 25, 2001
55 S.W.3d 888 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Patterson v. State

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE PATTERSON, Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Sep 25, 2001

Citations

55 S.W.3d 888 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)