From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Feb 22, 2000
No. ED76414 (Mo. Ct. App. Feb. 22, 2000)

Opinion

No. ED76414

February 22, 2000

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Shelby County, Honorable Ronald M. Belt.

Mark A. Grothoff, Stepen J. Harris, 3402 Buttonwood, Columbia, MO 65201-3724, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John Munson Morris, III, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Richard B. Teitelman, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens and Lawrence E. Mooney, JJ.



ORDER


Movant, Dewayne Patterson, appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Patterson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Feb 22, 2000
No. ED76414 (Mo. Ct. App. Feb. 22, 2000)
Case details for

Patterson v. State

Case Details

Full title:DEWAYNE E. PATTERSON, MOVANT-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE

Date published: Feb 22, 2000

Citations

No. ED76414 (Mo. Ct. App. Feb. 22, 2000)