Opinion
Nos. 08-1796, 08-1928, 082268.
Submitted: February 19, 2009.
Decided: February 23, 2009.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00611-RAJ-FBS).
Erwin B. Patterson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Hanson Lindley, Grady A. Palmer, Chesapeake City Attorney's Office, Chesapeake, Virginia, Stephen Michael Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, Marshall Allen Winslow, Jr., Wolcott, Rivers Gates, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Sara Ashley John, M. Richard Epps, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Robert Henry Burger, Williams Mullen, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Andrew Richard Fox, Assistant City Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, Joseph Franklin Verser, Jones, Blechman, Woltz Kelly, PC, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
In these consolidated cases, Erwin B. Patterson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court's orders cumulatively dismissing all defendants from this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. City of Chesapeake, No. 2:07-cv-00611-RAJ-FBS (E.D. Va. June 20, 2008; Aug. 8, 2008; filed Sept. 30 entered Oct. 2, 2008). We further grant Patterson's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, but deny his motion to admit new evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.