From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. Arshad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 10, 1994
209 A.D.2d 232 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 10, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.).


The medical evidence submitted by the moving defendants was contradictory and inconclusive with respect to whether or not plaintiff's injuries were "serious" as defined by Insurance Law § 5102. Accordingly, since defendants failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the motion was properly denied regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers (Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Kupferman, Asch and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Patterson v. Arshad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 10, 1994
209 A.D.2d 232 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Patterson v. Arshad

Case Details

Full title:LIZABETH L. PATTERSON, Respondent, v. LATIF ARSHAD et al., Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 232 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 1025

Citing Cases

Balkaran v. Shapiro-Shellaby

Inconsistencies in the findings by defendants' physicians raise factual issues that defeat defendants' motion…

Balkaran v. Shapiro-Shellaby

Inconsistencies in the findings by defendants' physicians raise factual issues that defeat defendants' motion…