From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patrick's Fine Foliage v. Anicasio

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 13, 1984
444 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. AT-84.

February 13, 1984.

Appeal from an Order of Deputy Commissioner Alan M. Kuker.

H. George Kagan of Miller, Hodges Kagan, Deerfield Beach, for appellants.

Guy A. Gladson, Jr., Miami, for appellee.


In this workers' compensation appeal the employer and carrier contend the deputy commissioner erred in awarding wage loss benefits; attorney's fees based on a finding of bad faith; and in making a prospective finding with respect to future entitlement to attorney's fees. We affirm the order, but strike the improper language dealing with future entitlement to attorney's fees, see B.P. Construction, Inc. v. Garcia, 440 So.2d 76 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Santa Rosa Marble, Inc. v. Ubieta, 436 So.2d 311 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); and City of Leesburg v. Padgett, 397 So.2d 732 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). In all other respects the order is AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Patrick's Fine Foliage v. Anicasio

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 13, 1984
444 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Patrick's Fine Foliage v. Anicasio

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK'S FINE FOLIAGE AND ESIS SERVICE COMPANY, INC., APPELLANTS, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 13, 1984

Citations

444 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)