From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patrick v. State

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Sep 27, 2012
NO. 02-12-00311-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 27, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 02-12-00311-CR

09-27-2012

JONATHAN EUGENE PATRICK APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE


FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to a plea bargain, Jonathan Eugene Patrick pled guilty to possession of one or more but less than four grams of methamphetamine. The trial court's certification of appellant's right to appeal states that this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal."

On July 20, 2012, we sent the parties a letter notifying them that the appeal could be dismissed unless any party filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f). We have not received a response.

Rule 25.2(a)(2) provides that a plea-bargaining defendant may appeal only matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court's permission to appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Because the trial court's certification shows that neither of these exceptions is applicable, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 44.3; Chavez, 183 S.W.3d at 680.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Patrick v. State

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Sep 27, 2012
NO. 02-12-00311-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Patrick v. State

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN EUGENE PATRICK APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Sep 27, 2012

Citations

NO. 02-12-00311-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 27, 2012)