Opinion
Nos. 05-09-00123-CR, 05-09-00124-CR, 05-09-00125-CR
Opinion issued February 8, 2010. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F05-73064-PJ, F08-63093-XJ, F08-63094-YJ.
Before Chief Justice WRIGHT and Justices FRANCIS and FILLMORE.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Thomas Ray Patrick appeals from his convictions for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, evading arrest or detention while using a vehicle, and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes these appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals. We affirm the trial court's judgment in each case.