From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patrick v. Faircloth Buick Company

Supreme Court of Florida
May 17, 1967
198 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 1967)

Opinion

No. 35477.

May 17, 1967.

Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Second District.

McClain, Thompson, Turbiville, White Davis, J.A. McClain, Jr., E.B. Rood, Tittsworth Tittsworth, Tampa, for petitioner.

Fowler, White, Collins, Gillen, Humkey Trenam and James E. Thompson, Tampa, for respondents.


By petition for writ of certiorari we have been asked to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, in the case of Patrick v. Faircloth Buick Company, 185 So.2d 522.

The petition reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court and we issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the decisions relied upon by the Petitioner present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. The writ is discharged.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

THORNAL, C.J., DREW, J., and McMULLEN, Circuit Judge, dissent.


Summaries of

Patrick v. Faircloth Buick Company

Supreme Court of Florida
May 17, 1967
198 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 1967)
Case details for

Patrick v. Faircloth Buick Company

Case Details

Full title:HENRY PATRICK, PETITIONER, v. FAIRCLOTH BUICK COMPANY, SALLY SMITH AND…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 17, 1967

Citations

198 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 1967)