From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patrick Berrios Designs v. Arthur Monroe Construction

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Mar 27, 2006
Civil Action No. H-05-3633 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. H-05-3633.

March 27, 2006


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for partial judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiff requests that the Court strike, as legally insufficient, all of the defenses asserted in Defendants' Second Amended Answer. After considering the motion and the applicable law, the Court finds that the motion, Docket No. 11, should be and hereby is GRANTED and that all of the defenses asserted in Defendants' Second Amended Complaint should be and hereby are STRICKEN. The Court further finds that, because Defendants have admitted to each of the elements of copyright infringement and have asserted no valid defenses, judgment for Plaintiff on the issue of liability should be and hereby is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Patrick Berrios Designs v. Arthur Monroe Construction

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Mar 27, 2006
Civil Action No. H-05-3633 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2006)
Case details for

Patrick Berrios Designs v. Arthur Monroe Construction

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK BERRIOS DESIGNS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ARTHUR MONROE CONSTRUCTION…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division

Date published: Mar 27, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. H-05-3633 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2006)