From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patenaude v. County of Sonoma

United States District Court, N.D. California
Nov 8, 2007
No. C 06-7783 MHP (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2007)

Opinion

No. C 06-7783 MHP.

November 8, 2007


ORDER (Ninety-Day Conditional Dismissal)


The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this action.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with a proof of service of a copy on opposing counsel, within 90 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered over, this Order shall stand vacated, and the action shall be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.


Summaries of

Patenaude v. County of Sonoma

United States District Court, N.D. California
Nov 8, 2007
No. C 06-7783 MHP (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2007)
Case details for

Patenaude v. County of Sonoma

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN J. PATENAUDE, Plaintiff(s), v. COUNTY OF SONOMA et al, Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Nov 8, 2007

Citations

No. C 06-7783 MHP (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2007)