From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patel v. Maricopa Cnty.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 17, 2014
585 F. App'x 452 (9th Cir. 2014)

Summary

holding that plaintiff's "Monell and supervisory liability claims fail as there was no underlying constitutional violation"

Summary of this case from Ruiz v. Cnty. of San Diego

Opinion

No. 12-16634

10-17-2014

SUNITA PATEL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARICOPA COUNTY; JOSEPH M. ARPAIO; DAVID HENDERSHOTT; BRIAN SANDS; DAVID TROMBI; CHAD BRACKMAN; GARY MCGUIRE, individually and in their official capacities; AVA ARPAIO; ANNA HENDERSHOTT; JANE DOE BRACKMAN; JANE DOE MCGUIRE, individually; JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-8 (whose identities are unknown but who are known to be Deputies and/or supervisory personnel of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, individually and in their official capacities, Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-01489-NVW MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Neil V. Wake, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 8, 2014 Phoenix, Arizona Before: D.W. NELSON, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Sunita Patel appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Maricopa County and six individual Maricopa County Sheriff's Office deputies and officials. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court did not err in granting summary judgment to the Defendants-Appellees. Under the totality of the circumstances known to the Deputy McGuire at the time of the arrest, a reasonable officer would believe that he or she had probable cause to arrest Patel for willfully failing to comply with Lieutenant Brackman's order to "clear the driveway." Thus, the district court did not err in finding, as a matter of law, that Deputy McGuire had probable cause to arrest Patel.

As there was probable cause to arrest Patel for willfully failing to comply with an official order, the Court need not address qualified immunity or whether Deputy McGuire also had probable cause to arrest Patel for recklessly interfering with traffic on a public thoroughfare or highway. Torres v. City of Los Angeles, 548 F.3d 1197, 1207 (9th Cir. 2008). In addition, Patel's Monell and supervisory liability claims fail as there was no underlying constitutional violation.

The district court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees on all of Patel's claims.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Patel v. Maricopa Cnty.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 17, 2014
585 F. App'x 452 (9th Cir. 2014)

holding that plaintiff's "Monell and supervisory liability claims fail as there was no underlying constitutional violation"

Summary of this case from Ruiz v. Cnty. of San Diego
Case details for

Patel v. Maricopa Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:SUNITA PATEL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARICOPA COUNTY; JOSEPH M. ARPAIO…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 17, 2014

Citations

585 F. App'x 452 (9th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Vallejo Police Officers' Ass'n v. City of Vallejo

See id.; see also Johnson v. City of Seattle, 474 F.3d 634, 638-40 (9th Cir. 2007) (noting that Monell…

Suit v. City of Folsom

In the absence of an underlying constitutional violation, plaintiffs' Monell and "supervisorial liability"…