From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patel v. Lowe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 15, 2019
CIVIL NO. 1:18-CV-1518 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 15, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:18-CV-1518

03-15-2019

HASMUKHBHAI PATEL, Petitioner v. WARDEN CRAIG A. LOWE, Respondent


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 2019, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1), wherein petitioner, Hasmukhbhai Patel, challenged his pre-final order detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c) by the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and upon further consideration of respondent's suggestion of mootness indicating that, on January 29, 2019, petitioner's status shifted to post-final order detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a) (see Doc. 11), which renders the petition moot, see Khodara Envtl., Inc. ex rel. Eagle Envtl., L.P. v. Beckman, 237 F.3d 186, 192-93 (3d Cir. 2001) ("Article III of the Constitution grants the federal courts the power to adjudicate only actual, ongoing cases or controversies."); Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996) ("If developments occur during the course of adjudication that eliminate a plaintiff's personal stake in the outcome of a suit or prevent a court from being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot."); Ufele v. Holder, 473 F. App'x 144, 146 (3d Cir. 2012) (holding that habeas challenge to pre-final order detention under section 1226 was rendered moot when alien shifted to post-final order detention status under section 1231); Rodney v. Mukasey, 340 F. App'x 761, 764 (3d Cir. 2009) (finding that the change in the procedural posture of the case from pre-final order to post-final order mooted petitioner's challenge to pre-final order detention under section 1226(c) because "[t]he injury alleged, unreasonably long pre-final order of removal detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c), can no longer be redressed by a favorable judicial decision"), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED as moot.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Patel v. Lowe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 15, 2019
CIVIL NO. 1:18-CV-1518 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 15, 2019)
Case details for

Patel v. Lowe

Case Details

Full title:HASMUKHBHAI PATEL, Petitioner v. WARDEN CRAIG A. LOWE, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 15, 2019

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:18-CV-1518 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 15, 2019)