From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pate v. Johnson

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
May 10, 2022
Civil Action 3:19-CV-735-S-BT (N.D. Tex. May. 10, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:19-CV-735-S-BT

05-10-2022

FRANKLIN EDWIN PATE v. KIMBERLY PRIEST JOHNSON, et al.


ORDER

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. See ECF No. 29. Petitioner filed objections. See ECF No. 30. The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objections were made, and reviewed the remaining portions of the findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court therefore DENIES Petitioner's Motion to Reinstate Case Due to Procedural and Due Process Errors by this Court [ECF No. 28]. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pate v. Johnson

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
May 10, 2022
Civil Action 3:19-CV-735-S-BT (N.D. Tex. May. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Pate v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:FRANKLIN EDWIN PATE v. KIMBERLY PRIEST JOHNSON, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: May 10, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 3:19-CV-735-S-BT (N.D. Tex. May. 10, 2022)