From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pate v. Inch

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 17, 2021
323 So. 3d 850 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D21-1493

08-17-2021

Richard A. PATE, Petitioner, v. Mark INCH, Secretary, Florida Dep't. of Corrections, Respondent.

Richard A. Pate, pro se, Petitioner. Lance Eric Neff, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Richard A. Pate, pro se, Petitioner.

Lance Eric Neff, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam. The Court denies the petition for writ of prohibition on the merits. See Topps v. State , 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that "clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits" is deemed a decision "which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel").

Lewis, Osterhaus, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pate v. Inch

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 17, 2021
323 So. 3d 850 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Pate v. Inch

Case Details

Full title:Richard A. PATE, Petitioner, v. Mark INCH, Secretary, Florida Dep't. of…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Aug 17, 2021

Citations

323 So. 3d 850 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)