From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pash v. Halko

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Feb 17, 2016
185 So. 3d 713 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 2D15–2957.

02-17-2016

Stephanie D. PASH f/k/a Stephanie D. Halko, Appellant, v. Donald A. HALKO, Jr., Appellee.

Keith Will Wynne of The Law Office of Keith Will Wynne, Plant City, for Appellant. Ashley L. Sigrist and Eileen H. Griffin of Griffin & Associates, P.A., Brandon, for Appellee.


Keith Will Wynne of The Law Office of Keith Will Wynne, Plant City, for Appellant.

Ashley L. Sigrist and Eileen H. Griffin of Griffin & Associates, P.A., Brandon, for Appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. However, the parties concede that paragraph 3 of the “ordered” section of the order on appeal contains a scrivener's error. Accordingly, we remand so that the order reflects counsels' stated agreement that the child, A.S.H., would time share when he was willing to do so, but that the child, A.C.H., would follow (one (1) day a week for four (4) hours).

Affirmed. Remanded to correct scrivener's error.

SILBERMAN, LaROSE, and LUCAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pash v. Halko

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Feb 17, 2016
185 So. 3d 713 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Pash v. Halko

Case Details

Full title:STEPHANIE D. PASH f/k/a STEPHANIE D. HALKO, Appellant, v. DONALD A. HALKO…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 17, 2016

Citations

185 So. 3d 713 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)