From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parrilla v. Rosenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 28, 2003
301 A.D.2d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

66

January 28, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, J.), entered June 28, 2002, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Robert M. Ginsberg, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Michael J. Hickey, for Defendants-Respondents.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Ellerin, Lerner, Friedman, Marlow, JJ.


Summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly granted in the absence of evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue as to whether the claimed hazard existed much less as to whether defendant property owners created or had notice, actual or constructive, of any such hazard (see Dumbrower v. Maharia Realty Corp., 296 A.D.2d 353).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Parrilla v. Rosenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 28, 2003
301 A.D.2d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Parrilla v. Rosenberg

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS PARRILLA, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. IRVING ROSENBERG, ET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 28, 2003

Citations

301 A.D.2d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
753 N.Y.S.2d 834