From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paro v. Weeks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 23, 1965
24 A.D.2d 1054 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

December 23, 1965


MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT. Although admitting acts of intercourse with complainant, appellant denied that any occurred during the period when conception took place. The testimony of the complainant and the corroborative evidence adduced from her witnesses conflicted sharply with the testimony of appellant and his alibi witnesses. In these circumstances we must attach especial weight to the trial court's superior opportunity to evaluate the credibility of the evidence and we find no compelling reason to disturb its conclusions. Order of filiation affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P.J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Paro v. Weeks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 23, 1965
24 A.D.2d 1054 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

Paro v. Weeks

Case Details

Full title:MARIE PARO, Respondent, v. MARSHALL WEEKS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1965

Citations

24 A.D.2d 1054 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)