From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parlato v. Brinkman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 5, 1951
279 App. Div. 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

October 5, 1951.

Present — Taylor, P.J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Wheeler, JJ.


Order reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint granted, with $10 costs. Memorandum: The terms on which the seller listed the property for sale with the plaintiffs were not accepted by the proposed purchaser. The seller was not obliged to accept any different terms or to negotiate on any new terms.

All concur, McCurn and Vaughan, JJ., in result only, in the following memorandum:

The complaint and bill of particulars when read together do not show that the plaintiff produced a purchaser ready, willing, and able to buy on the defendants' terms. Obviously the listing set forth in the bill of particulars does not include the complete terms. Essential terms remained therefore for later determination. (See Arnold v. Schmeidler, 144 App. Div. 420; House v. Hornburg, 267 App. Div. 557.) (Appeal from an order denying defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint.)


Summaries of

Parlato v. Brinkman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 5, 1951
279 App. Div. 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Parlato v. Brinkman

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH C. PARLATO et al., Doing Business under the Name of PARLATO REAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 5, 1951

Citations

279 App. Div. 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)