From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parks v. Tulalip Resort Casino

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 13, 2011
453 F. App'x 757 (9th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-35426 D.C. No. 2:09-cv-01219-RSL

10-13-2011

JAMES C. PARKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TULALIP RESORT CASINO, Defendant - Appellee.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding

Before: SILVERMAN, W. FLETCHER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

James C. Parks appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his employment discrimination action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Carson Harbor Vill., Ltd. v. City of Carson, 353 F.3d 824, 826 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Parks's action based on the doctrine of collateral estoppel because Parks was barred from relitigating the issue of sovereign immunity after it had been adjudicated in a previous dispute between these same parties. See Hydranautics v. FilmTec Corp., 204 F.3d 880, 885 (9th Cir. 2000) (outlining requirements for application of collateral estoppel).

Parks's remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Parks v. Tulalip Resort Casino

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 13, 2011
453 F. App'x 757 (9th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Parks v. Tulalip Resort Casino

Case Details

Full title:JAMES C. PARKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TULALIP RESORT CASINO, Defendant…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 13, 2011

Citations

453 F. App'x 757 (9th Cir. 2011)