From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker v. Nichter

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 9, 2010
10 Civ. 1804 (WHP) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 9, 2010)

Opinion

10 Civ. 1804 (WHP).

April 9, 2010


ORDER


The claims in this action arise wholly in the Northern Counties and all parties reside there. Accordingly, this action was inappropriately designated for assignment to Foley Square. See Rule 21 of the S.D.N.Y. Rules for the Division of Business Among District Judges.

The Clerk of Court is directed to reassign this action to White Plains in the interest of sound judicial administration pursuant to Rule 22 of the S.D.N.Y. Rules for the Division of Business Among District Judges.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Parker v. Nichter

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 9, 2010
10 Civ. 1804 (WHP) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 9, 2010)
Case details for

Parker v. Nichter

Case Details

Full title:ROSALIE PARKER, Plaintiff, v. MARK L. NICHTER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Apr 9, 2010

Citations

10 Civ. 1804 (WHP) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 9, 2010)