From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker v. G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENWOOD
Aug 29, 2017
CIVIL ACTION No. 8:16-2993-MGL (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 8:16-2993-MGL

08-29-2017

William Parker, Plaintiff, v. G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc., Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff filed this case as a job discrimination action. The matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) of the United States Magistrate Judge suggesting Defendant's motion to dismiss with prejudice be granted. The Report was made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina.

The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with the Court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270 (1976). The Court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report to which specific objection is made, and the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

The Magistrate Judge filed the Report on August 14, 2017, but Plaintiff failed to file any objections. "[I]n the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must 'only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.'" Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee's note). Moreover, a failure to object waives appellate review. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985).

After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case employing the standard set forth above, the Court adopts the Report and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment of the Court Defendants motion to dismiss with prejudice is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed this 29th day of August, 2017, in Columbia, South Carolina.

s/ Mary Geiger Lewis

MARY GEIGER LEWIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Parker v. G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENWOOD
Aug 29, 2017
CIVIL ACTION No. 8:16-2993-MGL (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 2017)
Case details for

Parker v. G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:William Parker, Plaintiff, v. G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENWOOD

Date published: Aug 29, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 8:16-2993-MGL (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 2017)