Park v. State Farm Gen. Ins. Co.

Full title: JIM PARK; NAN PARK, individuals, Plaintiffs, v. STATE FARM GENERAL…

Court: United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Aug 10, 2022

2:21-cv-04971 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-04971

08-10-2022

JIM PARK; NAN PARK, individuals, Plaintiffs, v. STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a business entity, Defendant.

*MATTHEW F. BATEZEL (STATE BAR NO. 185147) ANNE M. MASTER (STATE BAR NO. 172640) PACIFIC LAW PARTNERS, LLP ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY ONYX LAW FIRM ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF JIM PARK AND NAN PARK

JOHN E. MCDERMOTT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

[Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. 21STCV13456]

*MATTHEW F. BATEZEL (STATE BAR NO. 185147)

ANNE M. MASTER (STATE BAR NO. 172640)

PACIFIC LAW PARTNERS, LLP

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY

ONYX LAW FIRM

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

JIM PARK AND NAN PARK

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER

JOHN E. MCDERMOTT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court orders that the terms of the Stipulation Re: Non-disclosure of Confidential Materials shall govern the handling of such documents produced by State Farm in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.