From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Park v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Apr 20, 2022
No. 32868-21 (U.S.T.C. Apr. 20, 2022)

Opinion

32868-21

04-20-2022

JACOB PARK & KAREN PARK, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge

On February 1, 2022, respondent filed in the above-docketed case a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, on the ground that no valid notice of deficiency, as authorized by section 6212 and required by section 6213(a) of the Internal Revenue Code to form the basis for a petition to this Court, had been issued to petitioners with respect to taxable year 2018. In the motion to dismiss, respondent explained that petitioners had already paid the amount of the deficiency underlying this proceeding prior to the issuance of the purported notice referenced in the petition herein. The determined amount thus failed to qualify as a deficiency within the meaning of the governing provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Respondent further indicated that petitioners had no objection to the granting of the motion.

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the purported notice of deficiency is invalid. It is further

ORDERED that the Proposed Stipulated Decision, filed December 23, 2021, is hereby deemed stricken from the Court's record in this case.


Summaries of

Park v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Apr 20, 2022
No. 32868-21 (U.S.T.C. Apr. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Park v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:JACOB PARK & KAREN PARK, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Apr 20, 2022

Citations

No. 32868-21 (U.S.T.C. Apr. 20, 2022)