From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PARK LANE CORP. v. TRAVELERS IND

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
Apr 18, 1966
50 Misc. 2d 231 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1966)

Opinion

April 18, 1966

John L. Milling for Henry Fennell and another, defendants.

Gartenberg Ellinoff ( Irving L. Gartenberg of counsel), for plaintiff.

George I. Janow for Travelers Indemnity Company, defendant.


Motion is denied. Defendants Travel Holiday Tours, Ltd., and Henry Fennell move for a protective order (CPLR 3103, subd. [a]), by their attorney, whose office and post office address is in Jersey City, New Jersey. The question arises whether such representation is valid.

Section 470 Jud. of the Judiciary Law provides that a person regularly admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor in the courts of record of this State whose office for the transaction of business is within the State may practice as such. Upon giving up his office here, he loses his right to practice ( Matter of Fordan, 5 Misc.2d 372, and cases cited, pp. 374, 375). Control of its officers can only be maintained by the court with such a requirement. The merits of the motion are not reached.


Summaries of

PARK LANE CORP. v. TRAVELERS IND

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
Apr 18, 1966
50 Misc. 2d 231 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1966)
Case details for

PARK LANE CORP. v. TRAVELERS IND

Case Details

Full title:PARK LANE COMMERCIAL CORP., Plaintiff, v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY et…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County

Date published: Apr 18, 1966

Citations

50 Misc. 2d 231 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1966)
270 N.Y.S.2d 155

Citing Cases

White River Paper Co. v. Ashmont Tissue, Inc.

This has been specifically provided in section 470. Attorneys regularly admitted who subsequently move or…

Rosenberg v. Johns-Manville

The movant is correct as to the requirements of the Judiciary Law. Section 470 Jud. of the Judiciary Law…