From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parisien v. Travelers Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 50553 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)

Opinion

No. 2019-406 K C

06-03-2022

Jules Francois Parisien, M.D., as Assignee of Gonzales, Nicanor, Respondent, v. Travelers Insurance Company, Appellant.

Law Office of Tina Newsome-Lee (Duane Frankson of counsel), for appellant. The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for respondent.


Unpublished Opinion

Law Office of Tina Newsome-Lee (Duane Frankson of counsel), for appellant.

The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for respondent.

PRESENT: THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., WAVNY TOUSSAINT, DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Sharon Bourne-Clarke, J.), entered October 19, 2018, deemed from a judgment of that court entered November 15, 2018. The judgment entered pursuant to the October 19, 2018 order granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and denying defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $3,785.58.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, with $30 costs, the order entered October 19, 2018 is vacated, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied, defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for the entry of a judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court entered October 19, 2018 granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and denying defendant's cross motion which had sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath (EUOs). A judgment was subsequently entered on November 15, 2018, from which the appeal is deemed to have been taken (see CPLR 5501 [c]).

Defendant established that initial and follow-up letters scheduling an EUO had been timely mailed (see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 50 A.D.3d 1123 [2008]); that plaintiff had failed to appear on either date (see Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 35 A.D.3d 720 [2006]); and that the claims had been timely denied on that ground (see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond, 50 A.D.3d 1123; Greenway Med. Supply Corp. v Travelers Ins. Co., 58 Misc.3d 131 [A], 2017 NY Slip Op 51765[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2017]). As plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to defendant's cross motion, defendant is entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed, the order entered October 19, 2018 is vacated, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied and defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

ALIOTTA, P.J., TOUSSAINT and GOLIA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Parisien v. Travelers Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 50553 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)
Case details for

Parisien v. Travelers Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Jules Francois Parisien, M.D., as Assignee of Gonzales, Nicanor…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 3, 2022

Citations

2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 50553 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)