From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parish v. Marques

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Oct 31, 2019
Case No. 19-CV-1038 (NEB/TNL) (D. Minn. Oct. 31, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 19-CV-1038 (NEB/TNL)

10-31-2019

PHILIP LUTHER PARISH, Petitioner, v. R. MARQUES, Respondent.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has received the September 13, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. [ECF No. 15 ("R&R").] No party has objected to the R&R, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. This Court ACCEPTS the R&R [ECF No. 15];

2. Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: October 31, 2019

BY THE COURT:

s/Nancy E. Brasel

Nancy E. Brasel

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Parish v. Marques

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Oct 31, 2019
Case No. 19-CV-1038 (NEB/TNL) (D. Minn. Oct. 31, 2019)
Case details for

Parish v. Marques

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP LUTHER PARISH, Petitioner, v. R. MARQUES, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Oct 31, 2019

Citations

Case No. 19-CV-1038 (NEB/TNL) (D. Minn. Oct. 31, 2019)

Citing Cases

Pillow v. Bureau of Prisons

After that, he will be released from BOP custody, and it is highly unlikely that the BOP can be ordered to…