From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paris v. Saul

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division
Aug 13, 2021
2:20-00030 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 13, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-00030

08-13-2021

CYNTHIA RENEA PARIS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.


ORDER

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 23) recommending the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 20). No timely objections have been filed.

The failure to “timely object to a report and recommendation releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Lawhorn v. Buy Buy Baby, Inc., No. 3:20-CV-00201, 2021 WL 1063075, at *1 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 19, 2021); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (“It does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.”).

Regardless, the Court thoroughly reviewed the Report and Recommendation and agrees with its recommended disposition. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED, Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 20) is DENIED, and the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.

The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Paris v. Saul

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division
Aug 13, 2021
2:20-00030 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Paris v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:CYNTHIA RENEA PARIS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division

Date published: Aug 13, 2021

Citations

2:20-00030 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 13, 2021)